<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brad McConahay &#187; The Big Picture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bradmc.com/pages/the-big-picture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bradmc.com</link>
	<description>Original Music, Web Development, and Amateur Radio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 00:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Contact, a Quick Excerpt</title>
		<link>http://bradmc.com/articles/contact-a-quick-exceprt/</link>
		<comments>http://bradmc.com/articles/contact-a-quick-exceprt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 09:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Big Picture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.beatfrequency.org/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Contact&#8221; has always been one of my three favorite movies, and now I&#8217;m finally getting around to reading the book. I just ran across this paragraph&#8230; &#8220;Beyond the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere, on the other side of the sky, is a universe teeming with radio emission. By studying radio waves you can learn about planets and stars [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Contact&#8221; has always been one of my three favorite movies, and now I&#8217;m finally getting around to reading the book.  I just ran across this paragraph&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Beyond the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere, on the other side of the sky, is a universe teeming with radio emission. By studying radio waves you can learn about planets and stars and galaxies, about the composition of great clouds of organic molecules that drift between the stars, about the origin and evolution and fate of the universe. But all these radio emissions are natural-caused by physical processes, electrons spiraling in the galactic magnetic field, or interstellar molecules colliding with one another, or the remote echoes of the Big Bang red-shifted from gamma rays at the origin of the universe to the tame and chill radio waves that fill all of space in our epoch.&#8221; &#8211; (Carl Sagan, &#8220;Contact,&#8221; [1985], Pocket Books: New York NY, 1986, reprint, p.41)</p></blockquote>
<p>While this is just one paragraph that leads to a larger idea within the context of the story, I think it stands on its own as pure poetry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bradmc.com/articles/contact-a-quick-exceprt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Your Christian Friends Disappearing?</title>
		<link>http://bradmc.com/articles/are-your-christian-friends-disappearing/</link>
		<comments>http://bradmc.com/articles/are-your-christian-friends-disappearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Big Picture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.beatfrequency.org/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently found a passing interest in &#8220;end times&#8221; study, sparked by a couple shows on the Discovery Science Channel regarding beliefs surrounding the Antichrist. Sorry fundies, I didn&#8217;t find &#8220;da lawd&#8221;, but along the way I did find one of the most entertaining pages I&#8217;ve ever run across&#8230; The Rapture Index]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently found a passing interest in &#8220;<a title="end times" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_times">end times</a>&#8221; study, sparked by a couple shows on the <a title="Discovery Science Channel" target="_blank" href="http://science.discovery.com/">Discovery Science Channel</a> regarding beliefs surrounding the <a title="Tom Cruise" target="_blank" href="http://adorocinema.cidadeinternet.com.br/personalidades/atores/tom-cruise/tom-cruise01.jpg">Antichrist</a>.  Sorry fundies, I didn&#8217;t find &#8220;da lawd&#8221;, but along the way I did find one of the most entertaining pages I&#8217;ve ever run across&#8230;</p>
<p><strong><a title="The Rapture Index" target="_blank" href="http://www.raptureready.com/rap2.html">The Rapture Index</a>   </strong><-- CLICK!<strong><a title="The Rapture Index" target="_blank" href="http://www.raptureready.com/rap2.html"><br />
</a></strong></p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;You could say the Rapture index is a Dow Jones Industrial Average of end time activity, but I think it would be better if you viewed it as prophetic speedometer.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>As of this writing, the index is currently at 158.  The &#8220;Fasten Your Seat Belts&#8221; level starts at 145!  *gulp*</p>
<p>My favorite category here is &#8220;Liberalism&#8221;. It never fails to amaze me how much extraneous inference this otherwise simply defined word carries amongst the politically angled and pietistically insane.</p>
<p>By the way, I can&#8217;t help but notice that a few of these categories would make great band names &#8211; <em>Beast Government, The Plagues, The False Christs, The False Prophets, Kings of the East, Wild Weather</em> &#8211; I think <em>Food Supply</em> was already used for an abhorrent 70s and 80s pop ballad band.  No wait, that was <em><a title="Air Supply" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Supply">Air Supply</a></em>.  If they weren&#8217;t a sign of the Apocalypse, then I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
<p>Anyway, The Rapture Index is just one part of a site called <a title="Rapture Ready" target="_blank" href="http://www.raptureready.com">Rapture Ready</a>.  It&#8217;s filled with all the usual inconsistencies of people who think they know how to interpret the bible, and know which parts are to be taken literally, and which aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Here are some quick tidbits I learned from the FAQ:</p>
<ul>
<li>You can help stop your effiminent son from eventually being homosexual by engaging him in activities such as fishing, hiking, hunting, building a model, and cutting the grass.  Coincidentally, I just saw a crazy guy on &#8220;Cops&#8221; tonight who said that if he had a gay son, he would beat him every day until the gayness stopped.  I guess it just depends on your management style.</li>
<li>Vegetarians are a sign of the end times.  And on a related note, animals have no soul.  Wow, so vegetarians and animals are just like the RIAA.</li>
<li>Angels are real and they always appear as male, although it&#8217;s not clear if this necessarily means that they have a gender. However, angels appeared so male in the bible that the Sodomites tried to &#8220;git all up in dey bidness&#8221;.  Why wasn&#8217;t I taught this in <a title="Good News Club" target="_blank" href="http://www.cefonline.com/ministries/goodnews.php">Good News Club</a>?!</li>
<li>Christians and homosexuals are mutually exclusive.  You can&#8217;t be both. Now that&#8217;s just gay.</li>
<li>The antichrist might be gay.  Apparently it&#8217;s certain that the antichrist won&#8217;t dig chicks.  But they can&#8217;t decide if that means he&#8217;ll love himself, or other men.  Personally, I think any antichrist worth his weight in evil could only love Indonesian shemales, which would make the whole issue very blurry indeed.</li>
<li>Masturbation is okay provided you don&#8217;t think any adulterous or other immoral thoughts while in the act.  I wonder if fantasizing about a three way with your spouse and a <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furvert">furvert</a> is okay.  Did I just say that out loud?</li>
</ul>
<p>Here are some other highlights:</p>
<ul>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://www.raptureready.com/photo/antichrists/rap83i.html">The Mr. Antichrist Evil Pageant</a></li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://www.raptureready.com/rap49.html">The &#8220;I Missed The Rapture.  What Now?&#8221; Guide</a> &#8211; (Rapture for Dummies?)</li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://www.raptureready.com/photo/signs/link5.html">Popezilla!</a></li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://www.raptureready.com/photo/signs/link13.html">King Kong is the Antichrist?</a></li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://www.raptureready.com/photo/signs/link8.html">Spring break!</a></li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://www.raptureready.com/photo/signs/link9.html">Lots of purple, um, animal baloons?</a></li>
</ul>
<p>The writer mentions that he works in retail.  Having worked in the soul-draining field of retail in a past life myself, I think I understand why he needs something like this to do. Everybody needs a hobby, and I guess prophecy is as good as any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bradmc.com/articles/are-your-christian-friends-disappearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skepticism and the Cogito</title>
		<link>http://bradmc.com/articles/skepticism-and-the-cogito/</link>
		<comments>http://bradmc.com/articles/skepticism-and-the-cogito/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 09:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Big Picture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.beatfrequency.org/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like skepticism is what has lead us to â€œexpansion of knowledgeâ€?. Is it possible that skepticism is at the very root of self-awareness? Iâ€™m skeptical, therefore, I am? I realize that skepticism is one of many thoughts that can be included under â€œthinkâ€?, but do other apparent forms of thought lead to any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like skepticism is what has lead us to â€œexpansion of knowledgeâ€?. Is it possible that skepticism is at the very root of self-awareness? Iâ€™m skeptical, therefore, I am? I realize that skepticism is one of many thoughts that can be included under â€œthinkâ€?, but do other apparent forms of thought lead to any actual change from the current state of knowledge? If truth goes no farther than population homeostasis, or events just occuring in order to sustain existence, or some other reason without a sense of finality, then change, reason, logic, self-awareness, and truth all become ideas with no more reason than to just think them. All are thoughts that lead us to alter instinctive animal behavior, even though there is no apparent reason to do so. Yet thinking, especially skepticism itself, seems instinctive. Why think, therefore, why think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bradmc.com/articles/skepticism-and-the-cogito/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Truth</title>
		<link>http://bradmc.com/articles/truth/</link>
		<comments>http://bradmc.com/articles/truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 08:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Big Picture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.beatfrequency.org/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it possible to know what true information is, if there is any question that true information can be stored in organized matter? Our current political system seems less flawed than others yet doesnâ€™t appear to reach a state of true or false. If one mind deviates from a majority with regard to a specific [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to know what true information is, if there is any question that true information can be stored in organized matter? Our current political system seems less flawed than others yet doesnâ€™t appear to reach a state of true or false. If one mind deviates from a majority with regard to a specific subject, this doesnâ€™t seem to constitute truth. Yet, most observable life forms exhibit rebellion, seemingly inherently, based on logic or not &#8211; In which case I donâ€™t think the definition of truth is attainable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bradmc.com/articles/truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vector of Thought</title>
		<link>http://bradmc.com/articles/vector-of-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://bradmc.com/articles/vector-of-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 08:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Big Picture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.beatfrequency.org/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we would agree that there are no absolute truths &#8211; which would also allow for the possibility of absolute truths &#8211; and that all is just philosophy, then have we really made any evolutionary progress? We don&#8217;t currently have much more philosophical agreement on Earth than we had at the beginning of recorded history. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we would agree that there are no absolute truths &#8211; which would also allow for the possibility of absolute truths &#8211; and that all is just philosophy, then have we really made any evolutionary progress?  We don&#8217;t currently have much more philosophical agreement on Earth than we had at the beginning of recorded history.  Just mental movement, rather than movement toward something.</p>
<p>Physical science seems concentrated on things like extending individual material existence, compacting the practical uses of the concept of time, and creating things to help distract the mind from the day-to-day drudgeries.  Since none of these things, or anything else, can thus far be proven to have any ultimate importance, this just as well seems like random, or maybe circular, movement in thought. I always feel compelled to explore physical and mental philosophy, but can think of no ultimately important reason why.  If not to make some sort of forward movement, assuming that forward means &#8220;good&#8221;, then why?</p>
<p>If we would agree that mathematics is as imperfect and fallible as any other worldly concept, then it seems likely that math itself wouldn&#8217;t be any more or less related to a &#8220;grand scheme of things&#8221; than any non-scientific based school of thought, no matter how illogical it may seem.  Then why do we continue to build on its history?  Maybe that&#8217;s all we&#8217;re capable of doing.  But maybe the path from our current fixed point of knowledge toward whatever reason for existence might exist would actually involve a complete disregard for past or contemporary ideas, no matter how written-in-stone they may seem now. The extreme of &#8220;original&#8221; thought. All the world&#8217;s religions and all the world&#8217;s science thrown out the window.  Maybe our inability to think beyond the concept of space-time and all that it implies regarding our system of science is the very thing holding us back from any ultimate truth, assuming this is our goal.</p>
<p>But, I guess since most of those analogies use geometric and/or time related forms, then they are not valid by the very definition of this idea and would just be more circular thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bradmc.com/articles/vector-of-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

